|
|
Post by Lunatic Fringe on Dec 28, 2009 13:40:47 GMT -5
This was a big deal during the season. I didn't post a poll because I'm not sure yet what we're voting on. Waiver order=reverse order of finish? Waiver remains season-to-season or resets every year?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2009 13:44:34 GMT -5
Reverse order that changes every year with new standings? That's exactly what I think we should do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tecuala Juggernauts on Dec 28, 2009 14:22:41 GMT -5
Reverse order that changes every year with new standings? That's exactly what I think we should do. Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Nuke LaLoosh Express on Dec 28, 2009 19:22:29 GMT -5
I don't know if it's even possible in this format but in Fantasy Football the wavier priority resets every week with last getting the #1 priority. It was the ONLY reason I might make it into the finals this year and kept me competitive every day. If it's possible I'd love to add that feature.
Thoughts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2009 23:11:55 GMT -5
MLB players no waivers you drop then they are free game to all.
MiLB waivers need to be addressed.
steps that need to be followed 1. lose eligibility 2. Bosses need to make a thread this player has lost eligibility. 3. two day waiting period, then the team that is closest to the basement gets that said player. 4. that team is last NOW
|
|
|
|
Post by Bobby Ayala - Matt on Dec 28, 2009 23:29:49 GMT -5
MLB players no waivers you drop then they are free game to all. I disagree. This would mean whoever happened to log on the most would have the best shot at the best waiver players. It promotes, well, "vulturism." Let's keep a normal waiver system on ESPN, and if you win the waived player, then you post on the proboard later. MiLB waivers need to be addressed. steps that need to be followed 1. lose eligibility 2. Bosses need to make a thread this player has lost eligibility. 3. two day waiting period, then the team that is closest to the basement gets that said player. 4. that team is last NOW I disagree here too, but mainly about "the bosses" needing to let everyone know a player lost eligibility. That sounds like a lot of extra work for "the bosses" that only rewards people that aren't paying attention. Keep track of your own shit, and keep track of players you want. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2009 23:39:14 GMT -5
The problem is when they lost their eligibility.....It isn't explain that great. We had a problem last year.
We have had no problems with MLB players in waivers.....NONE. Nobody has had to use a waiver pick on any FA's, the problem has been with MiLB players
|
|
|
|
Post by Lunatic Fringe on Dec 29, 2009 18:20:14 GMT -5
The problem is when they lost their eligibility.....It isn't explain that great. We had a problem last year. We have had no problems with MLB players in waivers.....NONE. Nobody has had to use a waiver pick on any FA's, the problem has been with MiLB players Gary has a point here. Reading this and another thread leads me to believe we need to put real focus into our MiLB system. I'll propose something later. I'm at work now. |
|
