|
Post by Lunatic Fringe on Dec 31, 2009 13:45:01 GMT -5
I haven't had internet access in two days, and I think I have a kidney infection. I'm in serious pain. Do we need to extend the Meetings while we resolve the ownership issue of Lee's team? There are a few more issues to be discussed, and only 3 days left after today. Where does everyone stand on Matt's brother-in-law? What about the other team. I have to go for a little while; my back is absolutely killing me.
|
|
|
Post by Rusty Trombones - Jackson on Dec 31, 2009 13:49:53 GMT -5
I haven't had internet access in two days, and I think I have a kidney infection. I'm in serious pain. Do we need to extend the Meetings while we resolve the ownership issue of Lee's team? There are a few more issues to be discussed, and only 3 days left after today. Where does everyone stand on Matt's brother-in-law? What about the other team. I have to go for a little while; my back is absolutely killing me. Dave sounds solid, 16 legit teams is the most ideal scenario, sounds like we might have it.
|
|
|
Post by Tecuala Juggernauts on Dec 31, 2009 17:37:36 GMT -5
Dave sounds solid, 16 legit teams is the most ideal scenario, sounds like we might have it.[/quote] Agreed. Let's get rolling with Dave. I also think we need to continue the discussion about what to do in the future if owners need to be replaced. It's not efficient to simply argue back and forth, and then still have to replace multiple owners each year. I know it's fantasy baseball, and it's supposed to be just for fun, but it's not fun for the whole league when owners go AWOL. There are legitimate circumstances, like Junkies, but that's not always the case. And even in his instance, he's let some people know what's going on so we're not just stuck wondering.
|
|